trait theory
Gordon Allport (1897-1967)
Life
Born in Montezuma, Indiana
Grew up near Cleveland, Ohio
Son of country doctor
Youngest of 4 brothers
1922, PhD from Harvard
1st American study on personality traits
Dissertation = “An Experimental Study of the Traits of Personality"
Fellowship #2
Met Freud; Freud sat quiet
To break silence, Allport told Freud about the streetcar ride to his office
Allport concluded Freud’s emphasis on unconscious behaviors was wrong
1930-1967, taught at Harvard
social ethics
taught personality (probably first course in country)
Defining personality
Allport described and classified over 50 definitions of personality
Gave his own in 1937, revised it in 1961
"Personality is the dynamic organization within the individual of those
psychophysical systems that determine his characteristic behavior and thought"
Currently unobservable; Not yes able to measure it empirically
An inference that will someday be demonstrated directly; like planet Pluto
For Allport, personality is a real entity
Traits are not merely descriptive or “actuarial”
Traits produce behavioral consistencies that we observe
Traits do have causal status
Functional autonomy:
Traits which have become independent of their origins in childhood
Childhood might be root of the trait or tendency but do not continue to
influence the tendency in adulthood
It is not necessary to unearth where tendency or trait which dominates a
person’s life originated in order to help person deal with the troubling
tendency
A behavior might be done at two different times for two different reasons
read for reward in childhood
read for pleasure in adulthood
Theory
2 basic approaches:
Continuity theories
Changes are merely quantitative
Accumulation of skill
Closed system
2. Discontinuity theories
Makes transformation
Reaches successively higher levels of organization
Growth is qualitatively different
Reorganizes, regroups and reshapes inputs
Structure of personality changes radically
Open system, active, stages of development
Proprium
Core of the personality
One’s own or one’s self
Under the layers of our human psyche is an irreducible core that defines who
we are
Freud emphasized instinctual drives; Allport emphasized
traits
Traits
People are unique combinations of characteristics called traits
Personalities possess traits to different degrees
Tendency or predisposition to respond in certain ways; consistent and
enduring
A generalized neuropsychic structure peculiar to an individual
Definition
Consistent reaction patterns of an individual can be predicted from knowing
person’s personality traits
Limited set of adjective dimensions which
describe and scale individuals
Renders many stimuli functionally equivalent
Guide equivalent forms of adaptive and expressive behavior
An internal structure
Consistency in thoughts, feelings & actions occur:
Because an individual views many situations and stimuli in
same way
Many of individual’s behaviors are similar in meaning =
functionally equivalent
Traits are described in terms of a range
From one extreme to its opposite
Most people fall in the middle of the range
8 Characteristics
1. Exist in people
2. More generalized than habits
3. May determine behavior
4. Can be discovered with systematic observation
5. Only relatively independent of each other
6. Not the same as moral character
7. Inconsistencies don’t mean traits don’t exist
8. Some traits are unique to you
2 types
Common traits
Permit us to compare individuals within a given culture
No two people have identical traits
Roughly comparable traits
Categories
Single words: adjectives
Must be in the dictionary
18,000 adjectives
Identified 4,000 traits
Traits we share due to common biological & cultural heritage
Common organizing structures
Personal traits or Personal dispositions
1. cardinal disposition
Not everyone has one
Shapes all behavior
“Ruling passion” that dominates most acts
2. central Dispositions
Highly characteristic tendencies of individual
Adjectives or phrases a person might use
Most research focuses on central traits
Determine most of our behavior
Disposition to respond with “equivalence class” of behavior
to relevant situations, without rising to a ruling passion
3. secondary dispositions
Determine a few behaviors each
More specific
Many traits
Less prominent than central traits
Seen in fewer situations
Subject to fluctuation
Personality
Development
Proprium
Sense of self; “me” as felt and known
Stages
early infancy – no sense of self
bodily self – things and body are different; 2nd
half of first year
self-identity – year 3. Pride in your pursuits and
accomplishments; also comes with negativism; may have been inspiration for
“reverse psychology”
extension of self – years 4-6. develop egocentric self.
Others are there for me, including Santa, God, etc.; self extended to
possessions; self-image emerges at same time; hopes, aspirations; expectations
of others. Self-image emerges at same time.
rational coper – year 6-12.Think things through in your head;
like Freud’s ego
proprium striving – teens. How be adult and me at same time?
Rebel and hope parents restrictions will define them; begin long-range planning
Mature Personality (6 criteria)
Extension of sense of self
Functional autonomy
Warm relations with others
Emotional security
self acceptance
frustration tolerance
Realistic perception of skills
Self-objectification; insight and humor
Unifying philosophy of life & religion
As mature go from directionless to goal in life
Religion change from extrinsic to intrinsic
God favors my people
Living your life by your values
Criticisms
Circular logic
“Traits describe how people differ from others…, but they are not themselves
explanations of those differences… It would be meaningless, then, for me to say
that Harry argues and fights a lot because he is highly aggressive.” (Gray,
2002)
Raymond Cattell (1905-)
Life
Raymond Bernard Cattell
Born in Staffordshire, England
1937, came to the United States
1944-1973, research professor at the Univ. of Illinois
Theory
Personality consisted of 46 surface traits
Condensed to 16 source traits
1950, published the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF)
Other Accomplishments
2-factor theory of intelligence
Fluid (innate)
Crystallized (culturally constituted)
Reduced Allport’s list of 4,000 traits to about 171
Eliminated redundant or uncommon terms
Used Factor Analysis
Statistical technique
Combine highly correlated traits
Reduced list to 16 Personality Factors
Developed the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) to
measure traits.
Factor Analysis
A five-step Factor Analysis:
1. Ask people to rate themselves on each ter
How X are you on a 1 to 10 scale?
2. Compute correlations among the terms
Do people who score high on one attribute score high on the
other?
3. Interpret the pattern of correlations
what is related to what?
Are there clusters of items?
If so, why? “Factors”
4. Psychologize
Name the factors
What are the underlying dimensions
Some of the 16 Factors
Affectia
Outgoing – reserved
Intelligence More – less intelligent
Ego strength Emotionally stable – volatile
Dominance Assertive – humble
Surgency
Happy-go-lucky – somber
Super-ego strength Conscientious – impulsive
Parmia
Adventurous – timid
Permsia
Tender-minded – tough-minded
Coasthenia Individualistic – group-oriented
Allport’s adjectives using Q, T,and L data
Q-data
data gathered from self-reports & questionnaires
(questionnaire data)
T-data
data gathered in controlled test situations-observational ratings and notes
(test data)
L-data
data gathered over person’s life, school, work, community etc. (life data)
Copyright © 2007
Ken Tangen.. All rights reserved